Metz, Rudolf (2025) (Don't) fear the bad leader: three influential myths about bad leadership. Frontiers in Political Science, 2025 (7). ISSN 2673-3145
|
Text
fpos-2-1589496.pdf - Published Version Available under license Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. Download (547kB) | Preview |
Abstract
IntroductionScholarship on bad leadership remains dominated by leader-centric paradigms that overstate the explanatory power of individual traits while neglecting the relational and identity-based processes that sustain harmful authority. This study challenges three influential myths: that bad leadership stems solely from leader pathology, that followers are passive conformists, and that support arises from psychological similarity between leaders and followers.MethodsThrough a critical and conceptual review of political science and social psychology literature, the study integrates conceptual and empirical findings to reassess prevailing assumptions about bad leadership and followership.ResultsThe analysis reveals that bad leadership is not a deviation from normal leadership but an expression of its underlying dynamics. Harmful leadership emerges through interactive processes among leaders, followers, and permissive environments. Followers are not merely obedient or trait-aligned individuals; rather, they actively co-produce legitimacy through engaged followership based on identification and identity leadership. Individual-level dispositions such as authoritarianism, populism, or dark personality traits influence leader tolerance primarily within the framework of group identity and ideological alignment.DiscussionThe findings challenge simplistic narratives of deviance and emphasize the central role of shared identity, group prototypicality, and affective polarization in shaping moral judgment and political legitimacy. Norm violations by in-group leaders are more likely to be tolerated or justified, particularly when perceived as benefiting the group. Future research should further explore the interaction between personality, identity, and institutional context in enabling or constraining bad leadership.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Title in English: | (Don't) fear the bad leader: three influential myths about bad leadership |
| Keywords in English: | bad leadership, authoritarianism, populism, dark triad |
| Subjects: | J Political Science > JA Political science (General) |
| Divisions: | Institute for Political Science |
| Research funder: | European Union (EU), MORES project, grant no. 101132601 |
| Depositing User: | Enikő Meiszterics |
| Date Deposited: | 08 Jul 2025 09:53 |
| Last Modified: | 08 Jul 2025 09:53 |
| Related papers or data collections: |
Boda, Zsolt
(2025)
Moral Emotions in Politics - How they unite, how they divide?
[Data Collection]
Horst, Dorothea and Scherer, Thomas J. J. (2024) Visionen in der Krise: Deutsche Spitzenkandida innen zur Europawahl 2024 Visions in Crisis: German Lead Candidates for the European Elections 2024. Mediaesthetics – Journal of Poetics of Audiovisual Images, (5). ISSN 2567-9309 Boda, Zsolt and Ring, Orsolya and Szabó, Gabriella (2024) What kinds of emotions are mobilised by different policy fields? A text mining analysis of parliamentary speeches. Working Paper. MORES Working Paper Series, 1. (Unpublished) Metz, Rudolf and Plesz, Bendegúz (2025) The Irresistible Allure of Charismatic Leaders? Populism, Social Identity, and Polarisation. Politics and Governance, 2025 (13). ISSN 2183-2463 Hadarics, Márton and Krekó, Péter (2024) Nothing to see here, move along! Illiberal contexts as catalyzers of authoritarian misperception of democratic quality. Political Psychology. Kamkhaji, Jonathan and Radaelli, Claudio M (2025) Behaviour in Public Administration: In Search of Foundational Insights. In: The Humanities and Public Administration; An Introduction. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd, pp. 79-93. |
| URI: | https://openarchive.tk.mta.hu/id/eprint/645 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
