Does political polarisation undermine democratic accountability? Evidence from 28 European democracies

Patkós, Veronika and Plesz, Bendegúz (2025) Does political polarisation undermine democratic accountability? Evidence from 28 European democracies. West European Politics. pp. 1-33.

[img]
Preview
Text
Does political polarisation undermine democratic accountability Evidence from 28 European democracies.pdf - Published Version
Available under license Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (3MB) | Preview
DOI: 10.1080/01402382.2025.2543600
Original publication URL: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01402...

Abstract

Political polarisation has drawn significant attention recently due to its potential adverse impacts. Evidence suggests that various forms of socio-political polarisation are associated with weaker democratic and economic performance. This research investigates the relationship between two types of political polarisation and macro-level accountability – that is, citizens’ ability and opportunity to select, monitor, and control their governments. Using data from the European Social Survey, World Bank, and V-Dem databases, the study analyses 202 observations from 28 European countries over twenty years. The findings indicate a negative correlation between polarisation and democratic accountability. Specifically, countries with higher levels of polarisation exhibit weaker accountability, and as a country becomes more polarised, its democratic accountability further declines. The relationship is robust across alternative operationalisations of polarisation and different model specifications. This research underscores the detrimental effects of polarisation on democratic functioning and calls for more in-depth studies to better understand this relationship.

Item Type: Article
Keywords in English: polarisation, democratic accountability, European Social Survey
Subjects: J Political Science > JA Political science (General)
Divisions: Institute for Political Science
Research funder: European Union (EU), MORES project, grant no. 101132601
Depositing User: Enikő Meiszterics
Date Deposited: 16 Sep 2025 12:57
Last Modified: 16 Sep 2025 12:57
Related papers or data collections: Boda, Zsolt (2025) Moral Emotions in Politics - How they unite, how they divide? [Data Collection]
Horst, Dorothea and Scherer, Thomas J. J. (2024) Visionen in der Krise: Deutsche Spitzenkandida innen zur Europawahl 2024 Visions in Crisis: German Lead Candidates for the European Elections 2024. Mediaesthetics – Journal of Poetics of Audiovisual Images, (5). ISSN 2567-9309
Boda, Zsolt and Ring, Orsolya and Szabó, Gabriella (2024) What kinds of emotions are mobilised by different policy fields? A text mining analysis of parliamentary speeches. Working Paper. MORES Working Paper Series, 1. (Unpublished)
Metz, Rudolf and Plesz, Bendegúz (2025) The Irresistible Allure of Charismatic Leaders? Populism, Social Identity, and Polarisation. Politics and Governance, 2025 (13). ISSN 2183-2463
Hadarics, Márton and Krekó, Péter (2024) Nothing to see here, move along! Illiberal contexts as catalyzers of authoritarian misperception of democratic quality. Political Psychology.
Kamkhaji, Jonathan and Radaelli, Claudio M (2025) Behaviour in Public Administration: In Search of Foundational Insights. In: The Humanities and Public Administration; An Introduction. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd, pp. 79-93.
Metz, Rudolf (2025) (Don't) fear the bad leader: three influential myths about bad leadership. Frontiers in Political Science, 2025 (7). ISSN 2673-3145
Scherer, Thomas and Beichelt, Timm and Illger, Daniel (2025) Inventing an alternative: Populist imaginations of political leaders in audiovisual culture. Working Paper. MORES Working Paper Series, 2. (Unpublished)
URI: https://openarchive.tk.mta.hu/id/eprint/648

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item