Social Equality Is Rather Threatening Than Normative to Authoritarians

Hadarics, Márton and Kende, Anna (2025) Social Equality Is Rather Threatening Than Normative to Authoritarians. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 19 (4).

[img]
Preview
Text
Social Personality Psych - 2025 - Hadarics - Social Equality Is Rather Threatening Than Normative to Authoritarians.pdf - Published Version
Available under license Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (590kB) | Preview
DOI: 10.1111/spc3.70056
Original publication URL: https://compass.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/1...

Abstract

Authoritarianism is a key predisposition that serves as a motivational base for prejudice against non-conventional social groups, but less is known about the contextual bases of authoritarian prejudice. Using multinational data, we revealed how contextual social equality and inclusion affect authoritarian prejudice. Authoritarians' sensitivity to social and normative threats and conformity to norms would indicate the opposite influence of contextual equality on the relationship between authoritarianism and negative attitudes towards non-conventional outgroups. Based on data from the World Values Survey (2017–2022) and other country-ranking indices, and the analysis of authoritarian prejudice against three different groups (immigrants, gay people, and traditional gender roles), we found that social equality and inclusion strengthen the effect of authoritarianism on prejudice. These results indicate that social equality functions as a contextual threat, catalyzing the “authoritarian dynamic” rather than serving as an acceptable norm to authoritarians.

Item Type: Article
Title in English: Social Equality Is Rather Threatening Than Normative to Authoritarians
Keywords in English: authoritarianism, intergroup attitudes, prejudice, social context, social equality
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
J Political Science > JA Political science (General)
Divisions: Institute for Political Science
Research funder: European Union (EU), MORES project, grant no. 101132601, National Research, Development and Innovation Office (Grant No.: NKFI-K138429)
Depositing User: Enikő Meiszterics
Date Deposited: 03 Mar 2026 14:13
Last Modified: 03 Mar 2026 15:56
Related papers or data collections: Boda, Zsolt (2025) Moral Emotions in Politics - How they unite, how they divide? [Data Collection]
Horst, Dorothea and Scherer, Thomas J. J. (2024) Visionen in der Krise: Deutsche Spitzenkandida innen zur Europawahl 2024 Visions in Crisis: German Lead Candidates for the European Elections 2024. Mediaesthetics – Journal of Poetics of Audiovisual Images, (5). ISSN 2567-9309
Boda, Zsolt and Ring, Orsolya and Szabó, Gabriella (2024) What kinds of emotions are mobilised by different policy fields? A text mining analysis of parliamentary speeches. Working Paper. MORES Working Paper Series, 1. (Unpublished)
Metz, Rudolf and Plesz, Bendegúz (2025) The Irresistible Allure of Charismatic Leaders? Populism, Social Identity, and Polarisation. Politics and Governance, 2025 (13). ISSN 2183-2463
Hadarics, Márton and Krekó, Péter (2024) Nothing to see here, move along! Illiberal contexts as catalyzers of authoritarian misperception of democratic quality. Political Psychology.
Kamkhaji, Jonathan and Radaelli, Claudio M (2025) Behaviour in Public Administration: In Search of Foundational Insights. In: The Humanities and Public Administration; An Introduction. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd, pp. 79-93.
Metz, Rudolf (2025) (Don't) fear the bad leader: three influential myths about bad leadership. Frontiers in Political Science, 2025 (7). ISSN 2673-3145
Scherer, Thomas and Beichelt, Timm and Illger, Daniel (2025) Inventing an alternative: Populist imaginations of political leaders in audiovisual culture. Working Paper. MORES Working Paper Series, 2. (Unpublished)
Patkós, Veronika and Plesz, Bendegúz (2025) Does political polarisation undermine democratic accountability? Evidence from 28 European democracies. West European Politics. pp. 1-33.
Krekó, Péter (2025) The Rise of the Authoritarian Populist Right: The Illiberal Defenders of Freedom? Brown Journal of World Affairs, XXXI (II).
Sík, Endre and Krekó, Péter (2025) Hungary as an Ideological Informational Autocracy (IA) and the Moral Panic Button (MPB) as its Basic Institution. Central and Eastern European Migration Review. pp. 1-17.
Kamkhaji, Jonathan and Radaelli, Claudio M (2025) Patterns of Emotionalisation in Policy Narratives. Working Paper. MORES Working Paper Series, 3. (Unpublished)
Metz, Rudolf and Kövesdi, Veronika (2026) Teflon leadership: crossing moral boundaries with impunity. Frontiers in Political Science, 2025 (7). ISSN 2673-3145
URI: https://openarchive.tk.mta.hu/id/eprint/657

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item