Democratic Backsliding Based on Illusions: Authoritarians' Biased Perception of Media Freedom Contributes to Their Political Support

Hadarics, Márton (2025) Democratic Backsliding Based on Illusions: Authoritarians' Biased Perception of Media Freedom Contributes to Their Political Support. International Journal of Psychology, 60 (6).

[img]
Preview
Text
Int J Psychol - 2025 - Hadarics - Democratic Backsliding Based on Illusions Authoritarians Biased Perception of Media.pdf - Published Version
Available under license Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (496kB) | Preview
DOI: 10.1002/ijop.70126
Original publication URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/i...

Abstract

Authoritarianism plays a pivotal role in shaping anti-democratic preferences, including support for institutional restrictions on free speech. In this study, we present empirical evidence that authoritarianism undermines public discourse not only through such antidemocratic views but also by fostering ignorance regarding problems with freedom of speech. The study aims to demonstrate that authoritarianism is associated with a more positive perception of media freedom, particularly in contexts where such freedom is more problematic. Using multilevel structural equation modelling and representative data from 31 European countries in the European Social Survey (N = 59,685), we found that authoritarianism correlates with perceptions of media freedom (b = 0.45; p < 0.001), and indirectly, through this perception, with political support—indicated by political trust (b = 0.12; p < 0.001), satisfaction with democracy (b = 0.16; p < 0.001) and satisfaction with the government (b = 0.13; p < 0.001). Moreover, the association between authoritarianism and perceived media freedom is stronger in countries with weaker actual media freedom (b = −0.03; p = 0.016). These findings underscore how authoritarianism contributes to support for antidemocratic regimes that curtail the boundaries of public discourse, often fueled by biased perceptions of free speech opportunities.

Item Type: Article
Title in English: Democratic Backsliding Based on Illusions: Authoritarians' Biased Perception of Media Freedom Contributes to Their Political Support
Keywords in English: authoritarianism, freedom of speech, motivated perception, multilevel modelling, political support
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
J Political Science > JA Political science (General)
Divisions: Institute for Political Science
Research funder: European Union (EU), MORES project, grant no. 101132601, János Bolyai Research Scholarship of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences (grant number: BO/00662/25/2)
Depositing User: Enikő Meiszterics
Date Deposited: 03 Mar 2026 14:25
Last Modified: 03 Mar 2026 16:09
Related papers or data collections: Boda, Zsolt (2025) Moral Emotions in Politics - How they unite, how they divide? [Data Collection]
Horst, Dorothea and Scherer, Thomas J. J. (2024) Visionen in der Krise: Deutsche Spitzenkandida innen zur Europawahl 2024 Visions in Crisis: German Lead Candidates for the European Elections 2024. Mediaesthetics – Journal of Poetics of Audiovisual Images, (5). ISSN 2567-9309
Boda, Zsolt and Ring, Orsolya and Szabó, Gabriella (2024) What kinds of emotions are mobilised by different policy fields? A text mining analysis of parliamentary speeches. Working Paper. MORES Working Paper Series, 1. (Unpublished)
Metz, Rudolf and Plesz, Bendegúz (2025) The Irresistible Allure of Charismatic Leaders? Populism, Social Identity, and Polarisation. Politics and Governance, 2025 (13). ISSN 2183-2463
Hadarics, Márton and Krekó, Péter (2024) Nothing to see here, move along! Illiberal contexts as catalyzers of authoritarian misperception of democratic quality. Political Psychology.
Kamkhaji, Jonathan and Radaelli, Claudio M (2025) Behaviour in Public Administration: In Search of Foundational Insights. In: The Humanities and Public Administration; An Introduction. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd, pp. 79-93.
Metz, Rudolf (2025) (Don't) fear the bad leader: three influential myths about bad leadership. Frontiers in Political Science, 2025 (7). ISSN 2673-3145
Scherer, Thomas and Beichelt, Timm and Illger, Daniel (2025) Inventing an alternative: Populist imaginations of political leaders in audiovisual culture. Working Paper. MORES Working Paper Series, 2. (Unpublished)
Patkós, Veronika and Plesz, Bendegúz (2025) Does political polarisation undermine democratic accountability? Evidence from 28 European democracies. West European Politics. pp. 1-33.
Krekó, Péter (2025) The Rise of the Authoritarian Populist Right: The Illiberal Defenders of Freedom? Brown Journal of World Affairs, XXXI (II).
Sík, Endre and Krekó, Péter (2025) Hungary as an Ideological Informational Autocracy (IA) and the Moral Panic Button (MPB) as its Basic Institution. Central and Eastern European Migration Review. pp. 1-17.
Kamkhaji, Jonathan and Radaelli, Claudio M (2025) Patterns of Emotionalisation in Policy Narratives. Working Paper. MORES Working Paper Series, 3. (Unpublished)
Metz, Rudolf and Kövesdi, Veronika (2026) Teflon leadership: crossing moral boundaries with impunity. Frontiers in Political Science, 2025 (7). ISSN 2673-3145
Hadarics, Márton and Kende, Anna (2025) Social Equality Is Rather Threatening Than Normative to Authoritarians. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 19 (4).
URI: https://openarchive.tk.mta.hu/id/eprint/658

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item