Triaccca, Nicoló and Kamkhaji, Jonathan C. and Lironi, Elisa (2026) How European Union Policies Feel. Insights from a crowdsourcing study. Working Paper. MORES Working Paper Series, 6. (Unpublished)
|
Text
working_paper_6_15June2026_Final.pdf Available under license Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (2MB) | Preview |
Abstract
This working paper presents the results of a crowdsourcing exercise conducted within the MORES project to explore how moral emotions shape citizens’ perceptions of European Union policies. Drawing on 1,363 responses collected between May and August 2025, the study examines emotional reactions, perceived appropriateness of EU action, policy familiarity, and identity across five salient policy domains: the war between Russia and Ukraine, migration and asylum, climate policy (Green Deal), food safety, and economic policy coordination. Using descriptive statistics and exploratory bivariate analysis, the paper identifies distinct emotional and attitudinal configurations across policy areas. The findings show that EU support for Ukraine stands out as a unifying case, combining high familiarity, strong perceived legitimacy, and positive emotions such as pride and compassion closely aligned with European identity. By contrast, migration and asylum policy emerges as the most divisive domain, characterised by high familiarity but very low perceived appropriateness and strong negative emotions, indicating an area where attitudes are resistant to changing and largely driven by affective predispositions. Climate, fiscal, and food policies occupy intermediate positions, marked by ambivalence, conditional support, and varying emotional foundations. The analysis highlights that familiarity does not automatically translate into legitimacy and that emotional structures differ significantly across policy domains. These results suggest the importance of integrating emotional awareness into EU policymaking and communication strategies. While the crowdsourcing sample is not representative of the EU population, the findings offer analytical insights into how emotionally and civically engaged citizens evaluate EU action, pointing to the need for differentiated approaches to strengthening trust, legitimacy, and democratic resilience.
| Item Type: | Monograph (Working Paper) |
|---|---|
| Title in English: | How European Union Policies Feel. Insights from a crowdsourcing study |
| Keywords in English: | Moral Emotions, Governance,, Public Policy, Crowdsourcing, European Policymaking |
| Subjects: | H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General) J Political Science > JA Political science (General) |
| Divisions: | Institute for Political Science |
| Research funder: | European Union (EU), MORES project, grant no. 101132601 |
| Depositing User: | Enikő Meiszterics |
| Date Deposited: | 18 Jun 2026 06:54 |
| Last Modified: | 18 Jun 2026 08:31 |
| Related papers or data collections: |
Boda, Zsolt
(2025)
Moral Emotions in Politics - How they unite, how they divide?
[Data Collection]
Horst, Dorothea and Scherer, Thomas J. J. (2024) Visionen in der Krise: Deutsche Spitzenkandida innen zur Europawahl 2024 Visions in Crisis: German Lead Candidates for the European Elections 2024. Mediaesthetics – Journal of Poetics of Audiovisual Images, (5). ISSN 2567-9309 Boda, Zsolt and Ring, Orsolya and Szabó, Gabriella (2024) What kinds of emotions are mobilised by different policy fields? A text mining analysis of parliamentary speeches. Working Paper. MORES Working Paper Series, 1. (Unpublished) Metz, Rudolf and Plesz, Bendegúz (2025) The Irresistible Allure of Charismatic Leaders? Populism, Social Identity, and Polarisation. Politics and Governance, 2025 (13). ISSN 2183-2463 Hadarics, Márton and Krekó, Péter (2024) Nothing to see here, move along! Illiberal contexts as catalyzers of authoritarian misperception of democratic quality. Political Psychology. Kamkhaji, Jonathan and Radaelli, Claudio M (2025) Behaviour in Public Administration: In Search of Foundational Insights. In: The Humanities and Public Administration; An Introduction. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd, pp. 79-93. Metz, Rudolf (2025) (Don't) fear the bad leader: three influential myths about bad leadership. Frontiers in Political Science, 2025 (7). ISSN 2673-3145 Scherer, Thomas and Beichelt, Timm and Illger, Daniel (2025) Inventing an alternative: Populist imaginations of political leaders in audiovisual culture. Working Paper. MORES Working Paper Series, 2. (Unpublished) Patkós, Veronika and Plesz, Bendegúz (2025) Does political polarisation undermine democratic accountability? Evidence from 28 European democracies. West European Politics. pp. 1-33. Krekó, Péter (2025) The Rise of the Authoritarian Populist Right: The Illiberal Defenders of Freedom? Brown Journal of World Affairs, XXXI (II). Sík, Endre and Krekó, Péter (2025) Hungary as an Ideological Informational Autocracy (IA) and the Moral Panic Button (MPB) as its Basic Institution. Central and Eastern European Migration Review. pp. 1-17. Kamkhaji, Jonathan and Radaelli, Claudio M (2025) Patterns of Emotionalisation in Policy Narratives. Working Paper. MORES Working Paper Series, 3. (Unpublished) Metz, Rudolf and Kövesdi, Veronika (2026) Teflon leadership: crossing moral boundaries with impunity. Frontiers in Political Science, 2025 (7). ISSN 2673-3145 Hadarics, Márton and Kende, Anna (2025) Social Equality Is Rather Threatening Than Normative to Authoritarians. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 19 (4). Hadarics, Márton (2025) Democratic Backsliding Based on Illusions: Authoritarians' Biased Perception of Media Freedom Contributes to Their Political Support. International Journal of Psychology, 60 (6). MORES – Moral Emotions in Politics, (2026) MORES Annual Report: 2025. Project Report. ELTE Centre for Social Sciences. Benedek, István (2026) Polarizing transition? Opposition strategies and the rise of Péter Magyar and the respect and freedom party (TISZA) in Hungary. Comparative European Politics, 24 (1). Szabó, Gabriella and Ring, Orsolya and Beichelt, Timm and Lipiński, Artur (2026) Pride and Hubris in European Parliament Campaigns. The cases of Germany, Hungary, and Poland in 2019 and 2024. Working Paper. MORES Working Paper Series, 4. (Unpublished) Orosz, Gábor and Salamon, János and Enyedi, Zsolt and Whitefield, Stephen and Krekó, Péter (2026) MORES - Moral Emotions in Politics: Cracks in the System: A Democratic Inoculation Intervention that Enhances Recognition of Authoritarian Weaknesses. [Data Collection] Szabó, Gabriella and Farkas, Eszter and Ring, Orsolya and Beichelt, Timm (2026) Rage to reach: Anger as a political resource for newcomer parties – Facebook communication of German and Hungarian parties and politicians during the 2019 and 2024 European parliamentary campaigns. Communications. Orosz, Gábor and Salamon, János and Enyedi, Zsolt and Whitefield, Stephen and Krekó, Péter (2026) Cracks in the System. A democratic inoculation intervention that enhances recognition of authoritarian weaknesses. Working Paper. MORES Working Paper Series, 5. (Unpublished) Szabó, Gabriella and Ring, Orsolya and Lipiński, Artur and Beichelt, Timm (2026) Protecting collective worth: pride in European parliament campaigns in Germany, Hungary, and Poland. Frontiers in Political Science, 2026 (8). ISSN 2673-3145 |
| URI: | https://openarchive.tk.mta.hu/id/eprint/671 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
